|The whole point of the abortion debate centers around two things; the human child/fetus and the encounter from which that child/fetus results.
What has happened of late, many of us would point back to the sixties, is a return to a view of human sexuality (which is easily found many times in history) that would seemingly argue that it is a casual encounter with little ramifications physically or psychologically. And in many circles, it is an encounter that is viewed as be devoid of any idea of responsibility. Not everyone believes this. And from this disagreement much of the abortion debate arises.
One of the oldest documents points directly to human sexuality. Genesis 1.28 reports that after having created man he ‘blessed them and said to them; be fruitful and multiply . . .’ A command directed at procreation, the physical consequences of sexual intercourse. Genesis 2.24 points to the psychological aspects. The author notes that what the first man’s reaction upon seeing the first woman when he said, ‘this one is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh’ and the author goes on to note that ‘now this one he called woman (ishah) because from man (ish) this one was taken.’ The author goes on to note ‘for this reason a man leaves his father and mother, and he cleaves to his wife/woman, and they shall be one flesh.’
From this ancient document at least there is a very early understanding that sexual intercourse involved a psychological commitment, at least on the part of the man, that would have him leave his parents for another and also that it would/could result in the production of another human being.
I think that it could safely be said, outside of this ancient document, that those two aspects could be safely sustained. Additionally, following the Judaeo-Christian Bible based view, human sexuality is one of the potentially greatest acts in that from it comes the creation of a human being, the pinnacle of God’s creative act that human beings now share in.
So, sexual intercourse produces a living human being. It is not dead, it is alive from the moment of conception; it is not anything other than a human being-so too, from the very moment of conception the DNA says ‘human being’ nothing else. Two people are involved.
One school of thought is that this is a casual act with no responsibility or psychological commitment on anyone’s part and if anything is produced (living human being) it is only the woman who has a say in what happens. The logical outcome of this is that a person so arguing can not argue for requiring any responsibility, financial or otherwise, from the male partner. You are in the philosophical position of arguing that the woman alone decides if that little human being insider her, which she joined with another to produce, lives or is destroyed. And, there is no time limit as to when that decision may be made – the child is liable for destruction up to the date of birth. A side question to such a philosophy – why stop there? Why is the child able to be destroyed before birth and not after? Why is the arbitrary line drawn at birth?
Now some argue that the world of men force a woman to carry a child to term. They seemingly don’t recognize that a great majority of woman adhere to that same position. So too, I think that if they see men so selfish as that, would not a selfish man rather see no responsibility that comes from the above described philosophy? If men are the pigs people who take that position argue would they not be more apt to agree that the no responsibility position serves their piggishness more? Why would a selfish man want a woman to carry the child to term? Would he not be more inclined to remove anything that would require any responsibility on his part?
There are also those who argue that those who advocate for preserving the life of the unborn care nothing about the child after birth and that those who are for killing the child are in fact the more compassionate and care more for the child. Let me ask the reader to read that again. There are also those who argue that those who advocate for preserving the life of the unborn care nothing about the child after birth and that those who are for killing this child in utero are in fact the more compassionate and care more for the child. Does that make sense to anyone? So, by that argument the only ones supporting women’s help agencies or supporting adoption agencies are the pro-kill the child groups and that there would be no churches supporting unwed mothers, there would be no churches supporting adoption agencies. The argument would also require that only pro-abortion people adopt children and that those with a Pro-Life or religious view adopt no one. Again, does that seem or sound logical to you? Is that what we in fact find? Let me just say that every church I have ever belonged to either had the resources (large church) or had the information and supported financially those who had the resources. The churches are, in fact, a good resource for those seeking help.
What is called for is a recognition that sexual intercourse, despite all precautions (outside of sterilization of course) involves the possibility of creating another human being. All discussion needs to start here. And everyone who claims compassion for the woman, the man, or the child needs to acknowledge this. No one should (I know I am arguing against a tsunami here) go into a sexual relationship without knowing this, acknowledging it and being willing to accept the responsibility of the fellow human being that is created. It is and should be the responsibility of both partners. Ideally (again that tsunami of contra opinion) such relationships should occur only in marriage, the environment design to support and nurture children.
As an aside, this discussion notes that there are in fact medical reasons for terminating a pregnancy; either to protect the life of the mother or because the child has died in utero or some other such devastating reason.
Under the guise of ‘love’ modern thinking argues ‘there is no sin’ or rather ‘no behavior is sinful.’ And often the ‘love of Jesus’ is invoked but their definition is far removed from the Scriptural witness. The Jesus of the Bible, contrary to the Jesus of their imaginings, says, ‘there is sin and it is deadlier than you imagine.’
Recall that the ‘loving Jesus’ said, “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. . . .”You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT MURDER ‘ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.’ “But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell. You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.’
The Jesus of the Bible (too bad I have to make that distinction) says that there are actions that are sins, but there is Grace and forgiveness when there is repentence. How can you know, recognize, and embrace Grace if you deny sin? No Sin – no Grace.
Grace is so amazing because sin is so devastating.
A quick back up and very brief introduction to aspects of discourse grammar.
1 ⇐בראשׁית ברא אלהים את השׁמים ואת הארץ
2a⇐⇐⇐ והארץ היתה תהו ובהו
2b⇐⇐⇐ וחשׁך על פני תהום
2c⇐⇐ ורוח אלהים מרחפת על פני האמים
3a ויאמר אלהים
3b יהי אור
3c⇐⇐⇐ ויהי אור
1 ⇒In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth
2a ⇒⇒⇒And the earth was formless and void
2b ⇒⇒⇒And darkness was upon the face of the deep
2c ⇒⇒And the spirit of God was hovering upon the face of the waters
3a And God said
3b Let there be light
3c ⇒⇒⇒And there was light
I have inserted arrows at the beginning of clauses to demonstrate tabs which I am not sure how to do on FB. What the tabs show is varying degrees of primacy in the text – i.e., mainline clause and supporting clauses. The clauses without tabs are the mainline clauses as shown by the specific Hebrew verb form. Clausal forms and elements are the grammatical clues to the hierarchy of the clauses in their relationship to each other and to the overall text. In this text we have a mainline narrative text and a mainline hortatory (imperatival) clause (3a, 3c); a background action clause (1), a back ground activities clause (2c) and three setting clauses (2a, 2b, 3c).
In evaluating a text I normally remove the verse markers to get rid of any influence of the versifier and evaluate the text as a literary block. When done this way it can be seen how the text was meant to be read.
The grammatical markers (clausal structure mainly) are the indicators that the author used to show how he wanted the text to flow and what the main point was and what was backgrounding and support structures. I find it useful to think of a stage or a movie scene. You have the background or setting of the stage or scene. Then you have the background activities-things movie around giving more contextual information. Then you have back ground action – things happening closer to the front of the stage but not quite the main action. Then, closest to the audience and in focus you have the main action. The author of a text sets the stage and demonstrates the action by his clausal elements and structures.
The creation at the beginning (1) sets up what is to follow but did it in such a way as to provide background action to the main action – the creation of light. 2a-c gives the state of the creation prior to the creation of light; it provides the setting and background activity to the stage structure before the main action.
The main action is God speaking light into existence. It is very distinct in the Hebrew text by virtue of the verb form and the fact that that form is always found at the front of the clause.
1-2 is all background and setting. Structured the way it is it can take up any amount of time – microseconds to billions of years. The grammar of the text allows that. Day 1 does not begin until 3a. If you look at the rest of Gen 1 each day begins the same – and God said . . . ; and ends the same – there was evening, there was morning, day umptifratz.
בינך ובין האישה
ובין זרעך ובין זרעה
הוא ישופך ראש
ואתה תשופנו עקב
God speaking to the serpent:
I will put emnity
between you and the woman
and between your seed and her seed
he shall strike your head
and you shall strike his heal
Gen 3.15. I post this verse because it demonstrates the absolute value of knowing the languages to sort out theology and history.
In the 4th line the pronoun is masculine (he הוא αυτος) not feminine. It is in Hebrew and the Greek translation. Somewhere in the Latin texts of the Vulgate the pronoun was translated as feminine (ipsa) in complete opposition to the Hebrew original pronoun and the verb with it and the ancient Greek translation, thus being translated as ‘she shall strike’. This led to some very seriously bad theology concerning Mary; making her the one who defeats the serpent/satan and not Jesus, raising her to a point of prominence that is not in the original and the first translation at all. This carried over in English in the Douay-Rheims translation. Fortunately, more contemporary Catholic translations have corrected this but the effects remain.
ויברא אלהים את האדם בצלמו
בצלם אלהים ברא אתו
זכר ונקבה ברא אתם
And God created the man in his image (εικονα)
In the image of God he created him
Male and female he created them
Text note, in the Greek translation the first phrases’s ‘in his image’ (בצלמו) is left out.
One of the most interesting discussions that come up with Theological Anthropology is “what constitutes ‘the image of God’”? Most arguments entail ‘soul’, ‘mind’, ‘spirit’ ‘conscience’ etc. Not often do you see the two genders (male and female) put forth as part of what makes up ‘image of God.’ But, in the text it is noted. This verse, which is made up of three clauses centering around three uses of the the word ‘create’ (ברא), is a literary unit – it is meant to be taken as a whole. Grammatically, then, when discussing the ‘Image of God’, the first thing mentioned should be ‘male and female.’
בראשׁית ברא אלהים
Holy Writ opens with ‘In [the] beginning God created . . . ‘ The construction is anarthrous (no definite article [the] in Hebrew) leading many commentators to note that this indicates, not the ‘point in time’ beginning but rather the start of all that there is. Science argues that space and time are absolutely related elements – no space, no time. So, for God to create space and time he has to be outside of both-the creator of time is not bound by time. The Greek translation of this text too is anarthrous (εν αρχη) as is the opening of John which makes the very strong point of identifying The Logos (ο λογος) with God (אלהים θεος).
It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!
Faculty Lecture at SEBTS on Humility
March 7th 2013
I am, The Reverend, Professor, Doctor Shawn Clarke Madden,
Major, USMC, Retired. BA, MABS, MLS, PhD, EOD, DI,
MUC, GCM, NDR, SSD, RSM, RE8, PE5, 03
Head High Mucky Muck of The Library
One award is missing
But, Someone suggested that if I put up my Humility Award (its huge!) it would immediately be recalled.
I am The Librarian at SEBTS. I am paid fairly decently to spend someone else’s money on all the books I want to buy. I have also been given a key to the building that has all of the books!
As a Professor my sister has noted that I am paid to read. To tell others what I have read. To tell others what I think about what I have read. To test others on what I think.
I have been invited here today to tell you what I think.
It is based on what I have read.
In God’s Word.
I am going to tell you about what Holy Writ says about Humility.
Some of you may be surprised how much the Bible says about humility.
Now, you may ask—Reverend, Major, Doctor, Professor Madden, what does One of the Few, One of the Proud know about Humility? Don’t you guys say that ‘It’s hard to be humble when you are one of the Finest.’ Indeed we do.
But, my children, have you not heard or read
That only Nixon could go to China?
That only Johnston could enact the Civil Rights Act?
And Surely you Geeks and Nerds know
Only Kirk could go to the Klingons!
Few can tell you about humility as well as one of the Proud!
When I read Philippians chapter two, I see that the passage contains the wonderful, magnificent, unfathomable statement on the mystery of Christology.
But, Christology is not Paul’s main point—
It is an illustration, an example.
The focus is on humility and more concern for others than for ourselves.
Paul’s thesis is:
‘If the God of the universe can so humble himself so should we!!’
If he can come so infinitelyfar for us, even the least attractive of us,
Can we not come a much shorter distance
in our own relationships with each other.
So many of us loudly proclaim the love of God verbally but fail to proclaim it in our relationships with each other.
So too, many have found that the most difficult thing about loving God is loving those whom he loves!
If He can so humble himself as to cross the universe and eternity to find you and me,
Can we not cross the road, cross the foyer, cross the room
to find each other?
I am not talking about meeting someone to share the gospel
—we have little trouble exhorting each other to that
—I am talking about simply crossing over to share a piece of bread, a cup of water, a warm coat, a bit of conversation, a smile.
And not just with a lost stranger
—with our Christian brothers and sisters!
Have you noticed that in many families, those closest to us are treated worse than strangers?
Can you truly claim to love the lost
when you can’t demonstrate love for a fellow believer?
Of all the wonderful and clever tracks folks have come up with to get someone to consider the good news of God’s salvation, the best track ever that you can present is your own personal love and kindness shown in everyday acts of love and mercy to both the lost and the saved.
Do that and others will see the love of God and Christ in you
And then they will be more apt to listen to you
and the message of Christ that you bear.
You may ask, why am I bringing this up here, in a seminary chapel
We are all seminarians here, we are all training for the ministry
and dedicating ourselves to spreading the gospel.
We are all godly, are we not?
Why tell us?
Because we Christians need to lecture each other regularly on what it means to be humble, to put others before us. It is not an easy thing to do
The need for reminders is the reason the Bible is as big as it is,
Else all that would be needed is one sentence—
Love God, Love your neighbor.
But too often we forget these and we need to be reminded
And reminded often.
A few people know what the two great commandments mean.
Many need the expansion to the Ten.
Most need the reminder of the Six Hundred and Thirteen!
A real time example may illustrate this.
At The Library we have had more than one ‘Christian Ministerial Pastor Wannabe’ get angry and arrogant and upset about a fine they incurred due to their own neglect—accidental or purposeful, and yell at and berate our part time student workers.
They seem to ask our students
Do you not know that I have been ordained of God to spread the gospel and you want me to be concerned with a petty fine!
I am on God’s Mission—concern me not with your trivialities!!
They didn’t have the courage to bring their lack of Christian behavior to one of our supervisors or to me but rather bullied one of our students.
This happens more than once a year.
And it doesn’t only happen at The Library.
The Truth is, Our Christianity doesn’t always show through when we encounter someone who has inadvertently shown us our sin.
How many of us have shown our less than Christian side to a clerk or a waitress or some other lost soul whose only encounter with Christianity that day was with a ‘jerk’ who did not live the love of Christ that they professed?
Folks, we need to remind each other about humility
About our love of neighbor,
That is truly how, on a daily basis, we demonstrate our love of God.
We need to recognize the value of a simple life, a life lived by simply putting God and his concerns above us and our desires,
and putting others and their needs before our own.
Here are some practical, everyday, office things—
Be nice to library workers!
Follow Dr. Akin’s admonition—be nice to waiters! And to clerks!
Be nice to those who appear to be in the most humble of jobs,
Certainly more humble than that high exalted position you are in!
They may be the people that God has put in your path to test you and see if you truly love him by demonstrating how much you love those who are his.
If you are in your office, at your computer, working on a very important project (Facebook) and someone stops by to talk to you or ask you a question,
Treat them as if Danny Akin walked in!
Take your eyes off of the computer, turn around, greet them,
Look them in the eye and give them your full attention.
Don’t let James, the brother of our Lord, note that you pay more attention to only those you consider important and not the more humble folks of the world.
SHOW NO PARTIALITY when it comes to anyone who comes to see you.
Heck, they thought you were important enough to come visit, you should consider them important enough to turn away from the computer and whatever might be on it (Facebook).
If you are a pastor and go across the world on a mission trip to spread the good news of God and his love—a wonderful and noble endeavor to be sure—and one that more could be doing—
Make sure that you have first crossed the building
to get to know those that work with you here.
I have known folks that cross continents spreading the gospel but have not crossed the room to talk to someone who is sharing in God’s work with them.
Often completely lost strangers are treated better than fellow believers, brothers and sisters in Christ!
But isn’t that how families treat each other?
This is a lesson I learned from a Marine General.
Tall, lanky, John C. Fegan, with his chief of staff, the rather short, Col. Blue, would weekly walk the decks of the Marine Recruit Depot in San Diego and stop by and see how folks were doing.
He stopped by PFC Madden’s office, sat down and asked him how it was going.
If Marine Generals have figured out that it is good business to see what even PFCs are up to, make sure that you as Christian leaders do so as well!
Some pastors and Christian leaders get very much caught up in God’s calling on their lives and the vision and mission that they think that God has given them.
But, at the same time they have forgotten
(or too often it never crossed their minds)
that God has called others to work in his kingdom too.
Some ‘Christian leaders’ who, because of their ‘vision’, have set aside, neglected, and destroyed fellow Christians because they were perceived as interfering with the great leader’s vision.
Don’t you know that you are not the only one God has called to work for his kingdom?
The Secretary or Janitor is just as called
to their station as you are to yours.
Chances are they may be more faithful in their calling than you are in yours!
Let me say that again,
You are not the only one called by God in your organization.
Others are not there to serve you and your vision!
You are all there to work together for the kingdom of God
and each and every person is there at God’s behest—not yours!
Their job and calling is just as valuable to God as you and your calling!
If you have not read 1 Corinthian chapter 12 let me introduce you to it or remind you what Paul writes:
14 For the body does not consist of one member but of many. 15 If the foot should say, Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body, that would not make it any less a part of the body.16 And if the ear should say, Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body, that would not make it any less a part of the body.17 If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell?
18 But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose.19 If all were a single member, where would the body be?20 As it is, there are many parts, yet one body.21 The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of you, nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.”
22 On the contrary, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker/lower/not as important are indispensable,23 and on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we should bestow as great an honor, and our unpresentable parts should be treated with greater dignity,24 which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so composed the body, giving greater honor to the part that lacked it,25 that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another.26 If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.
Don’t get into your head that you are the one indispensible cog to God’s wheel
And the lesser folk are just tools to your end to be discarded at your whim and treated as you desire.
This happens way too often in Christian circles and leadership
and people are hurt and the message is too often irrevocably damaged.
And don’t think that your calling is the one great calling that everyone else should likewise be doing!
The greatest calling before God
is the calling that He gave to You for His Purpose and for His Glory!
You may be called to be a missionary by God. GREAT!
You may be called to be a pastor by God. JUST AS GREAT!
You may be called to be an accountant by God. AGAIN, JUST AS GREAT!
It is great to be called to be a librarian,
a Janitor, a Framer, a Plumber
Anything that you can name—those are all legitimate callings of God on someone’s life and just as important to him as any other calling.
The error would be to ignore your calling for one that someone else thinks is more important.
Your calling by God is your calling.
Someone else’s calling is their calling—one should not desire the calling of the other but faithfully fulfill the calling God as given them.
God has a purpose for you where you are.
For his good pleasure and for his glory!
If you find yourself moving into a position of leadership in an organization, do not forget that those who are there when you arrive were put there by God.
Their service to him does not depend on your whims and fancies. If you would be faithful to God then be faithful to his, to those whom he has given their own calling and mission whom you now find yourself partnered with.
You will not be someone’s lord and master.
If you are faithful, you will be their pastor—one concerned for them and their needs, even at the cost of your needs, fame, and glory.
Another lesson from Marine Corps Theology. Any Marine leader, Corporal and above, knows, when the chow line forms, the leader gets his chow after his Marines do. The larger the organization, the later the leader waits to eat. A good shepherd sees to the needs of the sheep before he serves his own needs.
Be wary of the praises of men. Do not think that the pay and accolades that you receive from men here are any indication of what awaits you after you cross the Jordan.
Pay and fame mean nothing to the creator of the universe.
You will be judged,
Not on great buildings and great programs you come up with
But on how you treat people.
Do you want to beat the bushes for money for some grand building project to name after someone with the big pockets?
Why not find the money for those God has given you the power to help?
Do you think that God is looking down your balance sheet to find evidence of your love in the number of buildings you raised up, or the number of awards you received, or the number of boards you are on?
If you have read Matthew 25 you then know that what God will be searching for as proof of your love for him is your love for those who are his. It is not the love and praises that men have for you that he looks for but the genuine love you have shown and demonstrated to others.
I asked a friend of mine one day why he did not do Meals on Wheels like some of us here do. He said it was because he could not leave a track or present the Gospel to those whom he would be giving a meal. He seemed to be looking for a single, short term encounter.
But when I look at Matthew 25
I see that the sheep are known by the shepherd by the fact that they gave someone to drink, something to eat, clothes to wear.
It doesn’t say that they gave someone something to drink And a Track
or they gave someone something to eat And a Track
But that they simply gave what that person needed at that time, be it drink, or food, or clothes, or a friendly visit at the right time.
What did James say? ‘If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace, be warmed and be filled’ and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that’?
My observation of God’s way of doing things is that if you provide someone what they physically need out of love they will then let you do something about providing to them what they spiritually need.
The demonstration of your love of a person in their physical need is a reflection of your love for them in their spiritual need. Jesus did that all the time. His physical acts of mercy, in the providing of food and drink and healing, was the proof to folks of his ability to do something about people’s need of spiritual food and drink.
Remember when he said, ‘your sins are forgiven’
And they questioned his ability to do so
And then he proved it by providing for that person’s physical healing?
His lesson to us in that is that your demonstrated love of a person’s earthly needs will show to God, and to them, your love for their spiritual needs and God will then give you the opportunity to provide that.
Another recommendation while I have such a large, captive audience.
Many are caught up in the extremes.
Extreme sports, extreme exercises, extremes in everything.
This often finds itself reflected in our having guests in our pulpits, those whom the world looks up to because they have done extreme things.
The word for them is ‘celebrity’. Sports figures, successful business men, famous individuals, are asked to come to our churches and from the pulpit tell us what they have done for God.
This comes from the Finney evangelism model—find famous people to speak and your pews will be filled!
Let me recommend another tack.
Don’t look for those who have done great things for God
But find those whom God has done great things for them.
And look to what is truly great. The things that gain people celebrity, I suggest, is not what God considers great. What is truly great is not always nor easily recognized. Probably because we look with the eyes of men.
Remember when Samuel was sent to Jesse to anoint one of his sons as the next king of Israel and Judah? Remember that God made a distinction between how man viewed things and how God viewed things. Samuel looked to the biggest and greatest among the sons of Jesse but God chose the smallest of his sons. God sees differently than we do.
Here is my lesson on this. When it comes to inviting someone to stand in the pulpit to speak, look as God would. Look for those whom God has done great things for and who can tell others of those great things but who aren’t easily recognized—those who are not celebrities.
What do I mean by great? Let me give you some examples of people that I know whom God has done great things in their lives.
These you should invited to speak at your church.
You have seen Mr. Eugene Smith on campus. Anyone who has been here for the last several decades has seen him here, humbling going about his work, the work God has set for him. He serves God and us by doing the little, mundane things around here so that we greater folk can bury our noses in books. He cared for a sick wife for many years before losing her. Yet he still works here every day with the most cheerful demeanor on campus, serving his Lord most wonderfully—doing well and faithfully what God has called him to. I suggest that he could tell you of God in his life.
In The Library, in the back in technical services, Steve Frary is gifted by God to buy books. He is the one that ensures that the books you need for your classes and your brilliant papers are on the shelves of the library.
He is expert in this task.
He is also going on twenty years as a double lung transplant recipient.
He was born with cystic fibrosis, a disease that kills most people early in their lives. God gave him the gift of two non-diseased lungs over twenty years ago. You would not know this unless you knew to ask him. You could not tell it by his demeanor—the praise of God is on his lips constantly. Ask him to tell you about the mighty things that God has done in his life.
Tom Innes is faithfully ensuring that the Francis Schaeffer collection is digitized and made available to researchers. God has gifted him in this. He is also the father of two very special needs children. His oldest daughter, English, has severe mental problems and is on some strong medication and currently resides in a home for people with those problems. She has only been there a little over a year. Tom and his wife Elaine had her at home for most of her eighteen years, dealing on a daily basis since her childhood with a person that it takes several folks to care for her now. And English has a brother. His name is Latham and he is a down’s syndrome child. Many of you probably know how difficult it is to care for a downs child.
God has worked in Tom and Elaine’s lives, has done great things for them by giving them the strength to care for those two special needs children and keep their marriage together. If you check statistics, most men bail on children like that. Tom and Elaine have learned to rely on God and he has gifted them with each other. And the praises of God is constantly on their lips. Ask Tom or Elaine to come speak to your church.
Michelle Shinholser is the newest member of the Library officer staff. Many of you may remember that she helped you at Lifeway. She is in The Library now and every once in a while we have to remind her that she can’t charge for the books and that the books will come back and that’s ok. Michelle and her husband Stephen are the parents of two special boys, Cody and Lance. I know that several of you suffer from diabetes, probably type two. So does Cody and Lance. And they also have type one. Their sugars and insulin are all over the chart and it takes constant attention to their blood work on the part of their parents. They get sick often just from the diabetes but they also are very vulnerable to regular diseases due to their fragile health and are in constant need of monitoring. Michelle and Steve can tell you of the goodness of God and the strength that he has given them to deal on a daily basis with their sons and their precarious health. And they are always remarking on the goodness and mercies of God. Ask them to come speak to your community of believers.
One of the most well known folks at The Library is Teresé Jerose. You probably know her as the great helper of library patrons in need of serious library research or technical help. She is the one who makes The Library function well and do its job.
Teresé and her husband David lived their lives with no children—the LORD had seen fit to give them only each other.
Until two years ago.
In their not quite advanced years David’s nephew and his wife, due to their stupidity and lifestyle, were forced by the courts to give up their children, Jace and Michael. Now these two boys are a couple of good looking healthy kids, physically. But they came to Teresé and David with some serious problems that came about because of how their parents raised them. God gave to Teresé and David some special needs boys who needed some very special parenting, parenting that did not have the advantage of starting with the boys from day one—as infants. They got Jace and Michael after they had started school and after they had been severely damaged. They had to take on two young boys who needed special attention. But they will tell you about the strength and mercy of God that they have tapped into to raise these two children in the ways of God and in his love. They will be happy to tell you of God’s mercy, strength, wisdom and blessings.
I could tell you about Cathy, a public school teacher who daily witnesses to the grace of God and mercies of Christ. She and her husband had wanted at least six children. But God gave them two very special needs boys. Michael and Nathan were both born severely handicapped. Michael was bed bound his entire fourteen years. Though Nathan could roll around he was still a quadriplegic. Their diapers had to be changed several times every day and to feed them took between an hour or two per meal. Michael passed away at age fourteen and Nathan at age eighteen. But Cathy and her husband can tell you about the daily strengths and mercies God showed them in the lives of those two boys, what a difference they made in their lives. They sing God’s praises to this day because of his mercies. They could also tell you of their daughter Emily who had very special needs brothers, whose brothers never played with her. But God blessed her too and now she is a teacher that God has blessed with a healthy son. Cathy and her husband, and Emily their daughter, could speak at length of God’s strength, mercy, and greatness.
Lee Jefferys, the Planter and Pastor of Open Road Community Church, ministers to the homeless, to the more humble of this world. He shares the gospel of Jesus Christ with the unchurched—As he says—from the crack house to the penthouse, 8-80, blind crippled or crazy. You can ride in, drive in or call in and he will welcome you in regardless of your dress or your mess. He has stories to tell of the transformational power of Jesus Christ!
So, if you are looking for someone to tell your church or group about the extremes of God’s mercy, love and strength, look not to someone who can tell you all about what they have done for God but rather look to Lee, Eugene, Steve, Tom, Michelle, Teresé and to Cathy. These folks can tell you about the daily, long term great things that God has done for them and their spouses in coping with the challenges that he has brought to them for his glory. Listen closely and you will hear the praises of God’s name from their mouths despite what looks to us like insurmountable issues, and problems, and challenges. In the eyes of men they are not the celebrities too many churches look to to speak from their pulpits. But in the eyes of God they are heroes. They are the ones who will tell you about what he has done for them for his good pleasure and for his glory through his son Jesus Christ.
The gospel message is getting out by those like these who are going out and talking to the lost in their daily lives.
These are the folks in the pews whose ‘going’ out is to the work place, to what some consider mundane jobs, but where lost people are. They are those who daily encounter, interact with, and engage the lost every day. Most times that witness isn’t a track or a presentation of the four spiritual laws—it is the presentation of the life and power of Christ in their own lives. It is the love of Christ presented daily in their own changed, transformed lives that the lost witness every day.
These folks are missionaries, they are doers of the Great Commission, they are folks who ‘go’ everyday to encounter the lost in their jobs, in their workplaces.
You want an effective and widespread Gospel witness?
Train these folks.
And how you train them is not always the monologue of a sermon
But the dialogue of the Sunday School classroom.
There the issues of the world are encountered, there the questions are engaged and hashed out, there the difficulties are discussed and fought over.
You want an effective witness to the lost of the world
Train your Sunday School teachers!
who teach those
who are ‘going’ out every single day to encounter lost folks.
Teach the Sunday school teachers what you have been taught here about the Bible (and its languages!), about theology, about church history, about all of the things you learned in your classes.
About how to use libraries and research tools!
I leave you with the lesson of Elijah from the book of Kings. Remember that after his great victory at Mt. Carmel he was chased south to Horeb by Jezebel.
In the depths of his despair and self pity when God asked him ‘What are you doing here Elijah’ he answered ‘I have been very zealous for the LORD, the God of hosts; for the sons of Israel have forsaken your covenant, torn down your altars and killed your servant the prophets with the sword.
And I alone am left.’
But he wasn’t alone was he? You are not alone nor will be alone.
You will not be the only one God has called and spoken too.
Like Elijah, you will not be the only servant of God where you are going.
There will be many others there too, serving as faithfully,
Serving as zealously as you.
Look up and see them. Treat them as partners and fellow servants.
Recognize that God has called them too.
And if God has set you over them at all,
Remember that it will be as a shepherd.
Be a good shepherd.
Care for the flock.
No greater love has a man than that he give up his life for another. John 15.13.
This is the essence of servant leadership, a form of leadership often expoused but not often observed.
We see one Marine shot and badly wounded. His fellow Marine has come to his aid, come to his aid in full knowledge that his own life was on the line. This is what Jesus talked about. This kind of cost and this kind of leadership.
A good military leader is the one who leads his men from the front. That is why there is a high percentage of second lieutenants killed in combat—they are leading from the front where the danger is highest.
So too a good leader will lay down his life to save the life of those in his charge. And such a leader cares not if that Marine pulls for the same sports team, espouses the same politics, philosophy, taste in music. Such a leader cares not whether that soldier lying wounded is his best soldier of if he is a brig rat. That leader places his life on the line to come to the aid of his soldiers. Period.
In the above picture, the wounded Marine lived. The one who went to his aid did not. He laid down his life.
How often do you see this in the corporate world? How often will a boss take the hit while protecting those who are his responsibility? And we are only talking about giving up a job, a career, or advancement.
How often do you see it in the church? And the church should be where you see it the most, shouldn’t it? If you are not willing to give up much less than your life to protect those whom you serve, how can you talk about giving up your life?
As you know, the Great Commission reads ‘Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.’
And you know that very many people teach that the ‘go’ should be taken as an imperative even though it is a participle. Too often this has been used to beat people over the heads about ‘going’ and becoming foreign missionaries (ever notice those so urging haven’t gone themselves?). Now, I have absolutely no problem with someone who sees God calling them to foreign missions but bad grammar should not be used to present bad theology. If the ‘go’ is to be taken as an imperative then only those who ‘go’ are the ones who are to make disciples—the rest of Christendom is left out of the Great Commission.
What follows is based on good grammar—discourse grammar specifically (check with Bob Bergen).
In discourse grammar the participles form the ‘background’ of situations—they are ‘offline.’ This is true of Hebrew, and it is true of Greek, especially the highly Hebraized Greek of the LXX and NT. That being true then the ‘going’ is back grounded. It is much better translated as such and not as an imperative. It should be, ‘wherever you find yourself placed by God, make disciples.’ Or ‘wherever you are going, make disciples.’
The grammatical structure of the text has all Christians, wherever they find that God has placed them, making disciples, not those who are specially called to ‘go.’ In my thinking, two of what could be argued are the most effective fields are nursing and teaching. I have taught junior high and high school in addition to the lofty teaching of seminary and I am married to a teacher and the father of a teacher. Teachers are the ones who encounter kids who are in the throes of growing up and learning to encounter the world. They desperately need a teacher who is a Christian and who presents a Christ like example to them.
So too nurses. Nurses, especially those in hospitals or hospice care, are encountering people in the most desperate of situations (I have been there with our sons, Michael and Nathan) and who most seriously need to be encountering on a regular basis a person who knows the LORD and who has a lifestyle and words to convey hope to those who most desperately need it.